Comparison of BARCO CX30 vs. IQShare WP40-IQBoard
WhatsApp WhatsApp
Mail Mail
Messenger Messenger
Skype Skype
IQBoard

NEWS

Comparison of BARCO CX30 vs. IQShare WP40

Comparison of BARCO CX30 vs. IQShare WP40

2024-04-29

BARCO CX30 and IQShare WP40 are both wireless presentation systems designed for business use. While they share the goal of enhancing collaboration and productivity in meetings, they differ in terms of features, parameters, usage, and pricing.

 




1. Intro of BARCO CX30

BARCO CX30 is a user-friendly wireless presentation system designed specifically for enterprise deployments. It offers enhanced security features and seamless integration with a wide range of peripheral devices and digital signage solutions.

 

2. Intro of IQShare WP40

IQShare WP40 is a wireless presentation system aimed at facilitating interactive presentations and collaborations in classrooms and meeting rooms. It focuses on providing an intuitive user experience and supports multiple connectivity options.

 

3. Differences between them

Heres comparison from factors like parameters, performance of Barco CX30 and IQShare WP40 for you to get a clear idea of the two products.


3.1. Resolution and Split Screens

The BARCO CX30 boasts a 1080P resolution with the capability to split screens into 2, while the IQShare WP40 offers higher 4K resolution and supports up to 4 split screens. This makes the IQShare WP40 ideal for high-definition content and multitasking scenarios, catering to users with advanced visual requirements.

 

3.2. Compatibility and Connectivity

Both systems support Type-C connections. BARCO CX30 has broad compatibility, including Type-C ports without DisplayPort support. However, the IQShare WP40 outshines with its versatility, offering compatibility with Windows, Mac, Android, iOS, Chrome, and Linux platforms. Additionally, its support for HDMI and USB connections enhances its adaptability.



 

3.3. Touch Control and Windows Selection

While both systems feature touch control for BYOD devices, the IQShare WP40 offers more extensive options for Windows selection, allowing users to choose between main and extended screens. This flexibility can significantly enhance user experience and productivity, especially in collaborative environments where multiple displays are utilized.

 

3.4. Screen Mirroring and Touch Control

The BARCO CX30 supports screen mirroring via dongle or app, but lacks touch control functionality for mirrored screens. In contrast, the IQShare WP40 offers screen mirroring through its app with full touch control support, providing users with seamless interaction and navigation across mirrored content, making it suitable for interactive presentations and demonstrations.

 

3.5. Wireless Connectivity Options

While both systems support BYOD hotspot connections, only the IQShare WP40 offers Wi-Fi LAN connectivity, expanding its wireless networking capabilities and facilitating smoother communication and collaboration among users. This feature can be particularly beneficial in larger or more complex environments where stable and reliable connections are essential.

 

3.6. Compatibility with External Devices

The IQShare WP40 from iqboard.net surpasses the BARCO CX30 in terms of compatibility with external devices, supporting Chrome Cast, Airplay, DLNA, and webcast functionalities. This wider range of compatibility enables users to effortlessly integrate various devices and technologies into their presentations, enhancing versatility and facilitating seamless content sharing across different platforms and devices.

 

3.7. Overall Performance and Latency

In terms of latency, the BARCO CX30 exhibits lower latency at 0.248s compared to the IQShare WP40's 0.809s to 1.000s. This lower latency can contribute to smoother and more responsive interactions during presentations, reducing delays and improving overall user experience.

 

3.8. Price

When considering the price of the BARCO CX30 and the IQShare WP40, several factors come into play. While exact pricing may vary depending on factors such as location, supplier, and any additional features or services bundled with the product, a general comparison can be made based on the systems' features and capabilities.

 

3.8.1. BARCO CX30

The BARCO CX30 typically positions itself at a mid to high price point in the market for wireless presentation systems.

Its pricing reflects its robust security features, seamless integration with peripheral devices, and reliability, making it a solid investment for enterprise deployments.

The BARCO CX30's pricing may be justified by its stable performance, compatibility with various devices, and security measures tailored for business use.

 

3.8.2. IQShare WP40

The IQShare WP40 often offers competitive pricing compared to the BARCO CX30, positioning itself as a cost-effective option for interactive presentations and collaborations.

Its pricing may be more appealing for smaller businesses, educational institutions, or organizations seeking a versatile wireless presentation solution without compromising on features.

Despite its lower price point, the IQShare WP40 still delivers impressive performance, high-resolution capabilities, and extensive compatibility with multiple platforms and devices.

 

4. Which is better?

The superiority between BARCO CX30 and IQShare WP40 depends on the specific needs of the user. If enhanced security and extensive integration are critical, BARCO CX30 might be preferred. Conversely, if a user-friendly experience and versatility in connectivity options are more important, IQShare WP40 could be the better choice.

 



5. FAQ

Q: Can IQShare WP40 be used in classrooms?

A: Yes, IQShare WP40 is suitable for both classrooms and meeting rooms, aiming to facilitate interactive presentations and collaborations.


Q: What are the main differences between BARCO CX30 and IQShare WP40?

A: The main differences lie in resolution and split screens, compatibility and connectivity options, touch control features, screen mirroring capabilities, wireless connectivity options, compatibility with external devices, microphone and camera support, and overall performance and latency.


Q: Which system offers higher resolution and more split screen options?

A: The IQShare WP40 offers 4K resolution and supports up to 4 split screens, whereas the BARCO CX30 has a resolution of 1080P and supports splitting screens into 2.



Q: What platforms are compatible with BARCO CX30 and IQShare WP40?

A: The BARCO CX30 has broad compatibility with Windows and Mac, while the IQShare WP40 supports Windows, Mac, Android, iOS, Chrome, and Linux platforms.


Q: Do both systems support touch control for BYOD devices?

A: Yes, both systems support touch control for BYOD devices, but the IQShare WP40 offers more extensive options for Windows selection, enhancing user experience in collaborative environments.


Q: Can users mirror screens with both systems?

A: Yes, both systems support screen mirroring, but the IQShare WP40 provides full touch control support for mirrored screens, unlike the BARCO CX30.


Q: Do both systems support wireless connectivity?

A: Yes, both systems support BYOD hotspot connections, but only the IQShare WP40 offers Wi-Fi LAN connectivity, expanding its wireless networking capabilities.


Q: Which system offers more compatibility with external devices?

A: The IQShare WP40 surpasses the BARCO CX30 in compatibility with external devices, supporting Chrome Cast, Airplay, DLNA, and webcast functionalities.


Q: Are there any stability issues with either system?

A: The IQShare WP40 experiences stability issues upon rebooting and replugging, particularly with microphone compatibility, while the BARCO CX30 ensures stability across multiple reboots and replugs.


Q: Which system exhibits lower latency?

A: The BARCO CX30 exhibits lower latency at 0.248s compared to the IQShare WP40's 0.809s to 1.000s, contributing to smoother interactions during presentations.




7. Summarize

While both the BARCO CX30 and IQShare WP40 offer compelling features for wireless presentations, each system caters to different user preferences and requirements. The BARCO CX30 excels in stability, compatibility with specific devices, and lower latency, making it a reliable choice for users prioritizing consistency and performance. On the other hand, the IQShare WP40 stands out with its higher resolution, extensive compatibility across various platforms, and advanced touch control capabilities, making it ideal for users seeking versatility and interactivity in their presentations. Ultimately, the choice between the two systems depends on individual preferences, usage scenarios, and specific feature requirements.



Here are some other articles that we think might interest you:

8 Things to Consider Before Purchasing a Presentation Switcher

Why Networked Presentation Switchers Trump Traditional Setups?

Why Opt for Presentation Switchers in Conference Rooms?


RESOURCE FOR YOU

Send Us A Message

Copyright © 2017.Returnstar Interactive Technology Group Co., Ltd All rights reserved.